|
|
|
Local News
Madison Verve
NEW
First Aid
World Map/Atlas
|
Education: That which
discloses to the wise and disguises from the fool their lack of understanding. CLICK ON THE
MOST
CURRENT DATES
BELOW FOR ASSIGNMENTS. ADVANCED COMPOSITION
ORAL/INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION
ENGLISH I
ASSIGNMENTS
All sections/parts of Guide to Writing Basic Essays Paragraph Development And Topic Sentences Paragraphs And Topic Sentences If you are having problems with
sentence fragments, comma splices,
Run-On Sentences( Fused ) Use what you have learned so far from the handouts and from class discussion to write a 500-700 word essay on one of the topics listed below, a topic suggested by one of them, or your own topic. Give your paper a title, underline your thesis statement, underline topic sentences, and fill in the purpose statement included with this assignment. Follow the thesis statement guidelines in the handout and on the thesis statement link on the Assignments’ page of my website. Try to include examples to help illustrate, explain, and clarify your points. Your next assignment will be an essay that primarily relies on examples to develop your thesis.
Some of these
topics/subjects are broad (the Internet) while others are fairly limited (your
best or worst job). Remember to limit both your subject and your
focus on your subject. Your focus is your limited concern. You can't, for
example, cover everything about your hometown or about MATC. After you have written your final draft, read it aloud to yourself. Then have someone else read it.
PURPOSE STATEMENT: Avoid words like know, see, realize, understand, comprehend, grasp in the second part of your purpose statement. This is not a mini-research paper, so do not use sources except to look up factual material such as names, dates, and statistics. See syllabus about the use of sources for 500-700 word essays
Cause/Effect Essay
In a 500-700 word essay, explain either the
causes or the effects of a situation that concerns you. Narrow your topic enough
to treat it in some detail, and provide more than a mere list of causes or
effects.
Topics to Consider: Labor strikes in professional sports Children searching for pornography on the Internet State laws mandating the use of seatbelts in cars (or the wearing of helmets on motorcycles) The pressure on students to get good grades The increasing need for more that one breadwinner per family The temptation to do something dishonest to get ahead The popularity of a particular TV program, rock group, or singer The steady increase in college costs The banning of cigarette advertising from TV The banning of smoking in restaurants and bars The absence of a draft The fact that more couples are choosing to have only one child or none The fact that most Americans can communicate in no language except English The fact that women increasingly get jobs formerly regarded as being for men only The pressure on young people to conform to the standards of their peers The emphasis on competitive
sports in high school and college Dropping out of high school
A related topic or one of your own choosing Underline your thesis and topic sentences. Include a purpose statement
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS' ASSIGNMENTS Read the following for review by October 09, 2009: Paragraph Development And Topic Sentences Paragraphs
And Topic Sentences
Run-On Sentences( Fused )
Have these read by March 10 All sections/parts of Guide to Writing Basic Essays Elements of Successful Essays, including the green links
Write a paragraph online
Comma Splices and Run-Ons( Fused ) Run-Ons
and Comma Splices II
Have these read by October 28 All sections/parts of Guide to Writing Basic Essays Elements of Successful Essays, including the green links
Read Paragraph and Paper Organization. Read
Transitions.
Read Writing
with a Sense of Purpose Read The Thesis Statement
ADVANCED
COMPOSITION ASSIGNMENTS
More controversial issues
Boilerplate
09/30/08 Read Parts of an Argument by 10/02/08.
An Argument from
Analogy
Final Essay
ADVANCED COMPOSITION
1.
Should women be assigned to
combat duty in the Army and Marines? Women have been in the military since the
War for Independence. The issue is not women in the military. The issue is women
being assigned to combat duty, as in soldiers on the ground shooting at people
they can see. In Iraq, women have come under enemy fire and have fought back,
but they were in non-combat roles, such as delivering supplies in a military
convoy, when attacked. They have not, for example, been assigned missions to
track down and eliminate insurgents or terrorists, missions that would
deliberately expose them to combat. Women have also flown combat missions off
carriers in both the Persian Gulf War and Iraq war.
2.
Is racial profiling of black
males by law enforcement an example of racism and stereotyping, or is it sound
police work based on reality? 3. Some states are considering passing laws making it illegal to spank a child. Several European countries already have similar laws banning the corporal punishment of children. Is using corporal punishment ever an effective way to discipline children? Whether you argue that it’s usually/often/sometimes effective or never effective or rarely effective, should states pass laws prohibiting it? Why or why not? Coherently integrate your two arguments. Of course, laws already exist that prohibit physical child abuse, which doesn’t include spanking or other “milder” forms of corporal punishment such as pinching a nerve over the shoulder (my favorite). DUE___________
These are short reads.
Required
Reading: Suggested Reading:
Straight
Thinking, Common Sense, And Good Arguments Establishing A Cause & Effect Relationship
Topic: Women In
Combat Roles In The Military Length: 1000 words minimum Follow the guidelines and advice you learned in chapter 6 of the text. Make a list of
your reasons (not to be handed in) for or against women in combat.
You should have this read by 4/05/02 Global
Warming I, II, III: Critical thinking in the
As you read through the text and as
we discuss points and concerns Argument
and Critical Thinking
Due Wednesday, 5/02/01
Supplement Class Content With These Resources:
Oral/Interpersonal Communication SUGGESTED SUPPLEMENTAL REVIEW READINGS: Non-Verbal Behavior/Communication Links
Six Ways To Improve Your Non-Verbal Communication
Group
Decision Making
Read the following for review: Gender Neutral Technical Writing Suggested Reading:
E-MAIL COMMENTS AND
SUGGESTIONS: Copyright 2000-2005 Moody's Student Web Site( R.Moody). All Rights Reserved.
COMM. SKILLS II READING ASSIGNMENTS : Read the following three
selections concerning e-mail in the workplace. CNN - Study: Giving bad news easier, more accurate, by e-mail - July 1, 1999
July 1, 1999
Web posted at: 1:02 p.m. EDT (1702 GMT)
CLEVELAND (AP) -- No one likes to hear they didn't get promoted or their
report was unsatisfactory. Delivering such bad news is no joy, either.
But bearing bad news is easier when done through electronic mail instead
of face-to-face or by telephone, a new study suggests. Negative comments
also are delivered more accurately when delivered via e-mail, the study
says.
Stephanie Watts Sussman, the study's co-author, said the reason seems
obvious.
"It's less stressful, if you have something negative to tell somebody, to
not have to face them," she said Monday.
When using e-mail "people don't sugarcoat. They don't sweet talk it. They
just tell it like it is," she said.
Sussman cautioned that the study isn't meant to advocate that people
deliver all bad news online. When negative comments are given
face-to-face, it's often taken as a sign that the news is important and
the deliverer cares about the recipient.
Sussman, an assistant professor of information systems at Case Western
Reserve University's Weatherhead School of Management in Cleveland,
conducted her research at Boston University.
Her co-author, Lee Sproull, is moving from Boston this week to take a
position at New York University.
It's important to examine how bad news gets delivered because receiving
accurate information -- even if it's negative -- can be the first step
toward helping an organization or an individual improve, the authors said
in their study.
The study was published in the June issue of Information Systems Research,
a journal of the Maryland-based Institute for Operations Research and the
Management Sciences.
In the study, 117 Boston University undergraduates were asked to deliver
information to a fellow student -- who was in league with the researchers
-- about a bogus resume the student supposedly submitted for comments.
When the participants had to deliver only positive comments about the
resume, they didn't distort the good news, no matter what form of
communication they were using: face-to-face, telephone or e-mail.
But when they had to deliver bad news, participants tended to distort the
negatives to make the criticisms softer. There was significantly less
distortion in e-mail than when participants were using the phone or
speaking face-to-face.
Participants also reported that they felt more comfortable sending bad
news through e-mail than any other way.
John King, professor of management at the University of California at
Irvine and former editor-in-chief of Information Systems Research, said he
has had an e-mail system for 20 years and often notices people are less
inhibited about sharing their ideas when shielded by the computer.
"None of this is particularly surprising," he said. "But until somebody
looks at it carefully you don't know if it's really the case."
Copyright 1999 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
CNN - The legal traps of e-mail - July 6, 1999
(IDG) -- The public display of corporate e-mail in Microsoft's antitrust
trial may have made employees across corporate America realize that
private e-mail messages don't always remain that way. But this publicity
is not enough to educate employees about the proper use of e-mail.
To protect themselves against a host of legal problems, experts say,
companies need clear policies on e-mail use. The policies should cover
everything from how long to keep old messages to who can read other
people's messages -- and IT managers need to be part of the team that
creates and enforces them.
The legal issues raised by e-mail are not new ones. What is new is
determining how old laws apply to e-mail -- and educating employees about
the subject.
"People say the most incredible things on e-mail," says Jim Bruce, a
partner at the law firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding, in Washington. "The
power of e-mail is in a sense its own downfall, because it's so easy to
transmit and collect."
According to a study commissioned by Cambridge, Mass.-based Elron
Software, which makes network and e-mail monitoring software, more than 85
percent of adults say they send or receive personal e-mail messages at
work. Seventy percent of those say they send or receive adult-oriented
personal e-mail messages at work; 64 percent of those who use their
employers' systems for personal use say they have received or sent sexist
or racist e-mail messages.
How large a problem is it that employees send jokes to each other via
e-mail? In some cases, it isn't a problem at all; in other cases, the
jokes could become evidence in a sexual harassment lawsuit. Unfortunately,
the legal lines are still being drawn that specify exactly what employers
need to do to protect themselves.
"There is very little law regarding e-mail right now," says Michael
Overly, a Los Angeles-based attorney who is special counsel to the
information technology group at the Milwaukee-based law firm of Foley &
Lardner. "The law that exists is state-based, which means that [laws in]
each state vary, and even the courts within a particular state may have
different ways of handling this issue."
The safest step companies can take for the moment is to establish a
reasonable policy on what constitutes appropriate e-mail use and to
enforce it.
The best policies are created by representatives of all the groups
involved, including IT.
"You need the lawyers to understand what's dangerous and what's not; you
need the IT people to know what's feasible and what's not; and you need a
smattering of people from the rest of the company to know what the culture
is," Bruce says.
Once a policy is established, IT managers can end up having a hand in
enforcing it. This can make some IT people feel uncomfortable.
"IT was involved in establishing the policy, but being the whip-holder is
not our job," says an IT manager at a manufacturing company in the South
whose rarely-enforced policy says that e-mail is not to be used for
personal use. "I'm a service function. I don't want to be a jerk. I'd
rather give people the benefit of the doubt."
This example illustrates how important it is to make sure a policy is
realistic and has the support of those affected by it.
Legal pitfalls
When representatives from IT, human resources, and other groups in the
company get together to formulate an e-mail policy -- or to make sure an
existing policy is working -- they should make sure it addresses several
legal issues.
* Liability. An employer without a solid e-mail policy is at risk of being
sued, both by its own employees and by outsiders, Overly says. E-mail can
be used as evidence in cases claiming sexual harassment, discrimination of
all sorts, or hostile work environments. But if an employer goes too far
in the direction of reading employees' e-mail, in an effort to prevent
this kind of liability, it could also be sued by employees for invasion of
privacy. Furthermore, third parties can sue a company for what its
employees do using e-mail, including e-mailing copyrighted documents
without permission, libeling another company, or violating anti-spam laws. "Any kind of liability that an employee can create through communication,
they can do through e-mail," Bruce says.
One IT professional who has been through the process of creating a policy
with his company says that a team approach helps to ensure that the policy
is balanced.
"The idea is to have enough legal and technical savvy to think through
what you really want to do," says this IT professional, an electronic
commerce project manager at a Fortune 50 company. "The reason I say 'think
through' is that in the early days of this work, some companies were
monitoring e-mail. Other companies were aghast. They came out with
statements like, 'We will guarantee that these e-mails will be private.'
If you happen to compromise that privacy, you may be in a precarious legal
situation. Think through the consequences of the privacy policy you want,
implement it, and communicate it."
Overly says that many problems can be prevented by a solid policy that
spells out the company's right to read employees' e-mail when necessary.
"Employers must have the ability to review everything on their computer
systems to make sure that there's no illegal activity being conducted,"
Overly says. "If someone conducts criminal activity using an e-mail
system, unknown to the company, the company's e-mail system can be subject
to seizure. Or an employer may be sued in a breach of contract case. As
part of that they're going to have to go through a lot of employee
e-mail."
Even if no one has done anything illegal, it is sometimes necessary to go
through an employee's e-mail for other reasons, such as to retrieve
crucial documents if they are unexpectedly absent.
"Can employees sue for invasion of privacy?" Overly says. "The general
rule is that if an employer has a clearly written e-mail policy that says
the employee has no expectation of privacy, the employer will probably be
safe."
* Protection of the information and reputation of the business. "It's so
easy to send information with e-mail," Overly says. This includes, of
course, information that a company may not want sent anywhere, such as the
strategic plan for the next product release. The ease of forwarding
messages and using mailing lists means that employees may inadvertently
send sensitive information outside of the company.
A good e-mail policy will caution employees to be careful about what they
send outside the company -- both to make sure there's no confidential
information and to be sure they know that whenever they send an e-mail
message outside of the company, they are in effect representing the
company.
"Employees need to understand that when they are using e-mail they are a
de facto [representative] for the company," Overly says.
* Protection of the company's resources. One large, innocuous graphics
file forwarded to the whole company can bring down an e-mail system.
Experts say e-mail policies need to explain to employees how to handle
attachments and other documents that might cause problems.
"I've had major companies tell me they're more concerned about this issue
than they are about [all the other] issues combined," Overly says.
* Encryption. Sometimes it's useful for companies to encrypt e-mail, Bruce
says.
But what if employees decide to encrypt their own e-mail so that the
employer can't read it? Overly says most policies should include a
provision saying that employers must have the key to decrypt any messages
that an employee encrypts on an employer's system.
* Document retention. Many companies routinely destroy paper documents
that they aren't legally required to keep -- but many do not extend this
policy to e-mail, experts say.
"If a company is sued, it is routine for the other party to ask the
company to produce all their records [on the subject], including e-mail,"
Bruce says. "E-mail is a really juicy target because it can be searched by
keyword."
Bruce says that there's no reason not to routinely delete e-mail. However,
an e-mail-deletion system must preserve any documents that the company is
legally required to keep. And if the company becomes involved in
litigation, it must stop deleting e-mail that might be relevant.
Some companies' policies say that e-mail can be stored only for a limited
time, and that e-mail messages that need to be preserved should be
converted into another form.
The Fortune 50 project manager says that his company's policy makes it
clear that its e-mail system is not a document-retention system."If it is
a record that needs to be preserved, then it needs to be moved into
something where we can retrieve it," he says. "There is an enormous amount
of stuff built into a records retention system to make sure that 50 years
from now you'll be able to recover it."
Promoting the policy
In addition to creating a realistic policy about e-mail use, companies
need to educate employees about that policy and enforce it.
The policy that makes the most sense for most companies, Bruce says, is to
allow a limited amount of personal use of e-mail, but to make sure
employees understand that any documents they create with the company's
system will be treated like other company documents.
The policy should deal with enforcement, as well. Some employers enforce
their policy with monitoring software that flags messages containing
suspicious words. You can set monitoring software, for example, to not let
documents with code words for secret projects be e-mailed to anyone
outside the company. It can also catch words that might be discriminatory
or offensive.
In some cases, using monitoring software may help a company defend itself
against sexual harassment lawsuits, for example -- it can help show that
the company was really trying to prevent harassment, Bruce says. However,
if a company is monitoring e-mail, it's vital to make sure the employees
know about it, Bruce warns.
Jeff LePage, director of MIS at American Fast Freight, in Kent, Wash., has
been using Content Technologies' MIMEsweeper to monitor e-mail at his
company for about one year. He says the employees' knowledge that the
filter was there has cut down on the number of adult-oriented jokes and
other inappropriate messages. He says that once the policy and software
were explained to employees, few complained.
"I would have thought people would take it differently, but most people
don't seem to mind," LePage says. "There were a few individuals who were
detractors of the policy. But how do you fight something like this --
demand that you should be able to send dirty jokes to everyone in the
organization?"
However, not all companies have found e-mail monitoring to be practical.
"It's a lot of administrative work," says the Fortune 50 project manager
of the work required to check out the messages that are caught by the
software, some of which turn out to be harmless. "If someone wants to
communicate something externally that's proprietary information, they're
going to do that anyway -- they'll put it on a diskette or a CD."
Once the policy has been written and communicated, employee education and
communication must be ongoing.
"From a morale standpoint it makes sense for employees to know where they
stand," Bruce says. "Usually rumors of what companies are doing with
e-mail systems are a lot worse than the truth."
"The place where you end up in trouble is if different people in the
company think there are different policies, because where that typically
gets sorted out is in the courts," says the project manager.
Employees need to realize that despite e-mail's casual feel, it is
nonetheless an official company document.
"E-mail doesn't look like the traditional business communication -- it has
the feel of sticking a Post-It on somebody's desk," Overly says. "E-mail
can be sent without a lot of reflection. Most employees don't really think
of the fact that when you send an e-mail there will be a copy on your
computer, the network backup tape, etc. It's frequently harder to get rid
of an e-mail than a written document."
Finally, remember that making a policy work requires an ongoing effort.
"You really have to work at this," Bruce says. "You can't just do it and
say that's it. You have problems that come up every day."
Margaret Steen edits InfoWorld's Enterprise Careers section.
Cyber Law Journal: E-Mail Abuse Leads to Firings at Investment Firm
May 14, 1999 By PAMELA MENDELS KPO
E-Mail Abuse Leads to Firings at Investment Firm
The internal investigation at Edward Jones, a large investment firm
based in St. Louis, began in April after an employee complained about
an offensive e-mail message.
It ended last week when the company said that it had fired 18
employees, allowed one to resign and disciplined 41 others.
The company, which has 2,700 employees in St. Louis, has disclosed few
details about the incident, and has not released the names of the
employees involved. But what is known suggests that Edward Jones, like
many employers, is concerned about the potential of employee e-mail to
cause mischief in the workplace, and is taking serious steps to
control it.
"There is a heightened awareness and a moving toward a closer
examination of companies' approach to e-mail," said Amy H. Kohn, a
lawyer and employment law consultant for Hewitt Associates, a
management consulting company in Lincolnshire, Ill.
Kohn said that companies are worried about a number of problems raised
by employee e-mail. One is the increasing use of e-mail as evidence in
corporate litigation. Another is the ease with which confidential
financial information or trade secrets could be broadcast to the
world.
One measure of companies' increased awareness of the power of employee
e-mail is the growing number of employers that monitor it. About 27
percent of companies surveyed this year by the American Management
Association reported that they stored and reviewed e-mail messages, up
from about 20 percent in 1998. Generally, employers look at e-mail in
spot checks or in the course of investigations.
At the same time, the American Civil Liberties Union is hearing from
employees disturbed about e-mail snooping. The organization receives
about six to seven complaints a week, according to Jeremy E. Gruber,
legal director of the ACLU's Workplace Rights Project. Among those
complaints was one from a woman who found that intimate messages she
had sent to her boyfriend through the company e-mail system had been
printed out and posted on a bulletin board by her boss, who had
monitored the messages, Gruber said.
In general, Gruber noted, the law offers little privacy protection for
employee e-mail, and employees should be aware that even after they
delete a message, it is still likely to exist somewhere in the company
computer system. How much personal use of company e-mail is acceptable? Gruber believes this lack of protection is a workplace injustice.
"People are at their job 9 to 5, usually even longer these days," he
said. "They clearly are going to have to conduct some personal
business in the course of the day. And these days, that often involves
e-mail."
But employers have their own worries when employees begin tapping out
notes on subjects that have little to do with the job at hand. Kohn
said that companies are grappling with the question of how much they
should allow employees to use e-mail for personal messages.
Some workplaces are informal enough that tough e-mail restrictions
would be at odds with company culture. On the other hand, employers
fear that if they allow use of the corporate e-mail system for things
like, say, the sale of Girl Scout cookies, they could also be opening
the door for things that are less desirable, at least in corporate
eyes, like online labor organizing or just general time-wasting.
Companies are also wary of employee e-mail ending up as the
centerpiece in workplace discrimination cases.
For example, a racist joke sent by e-mail to about 22 Citibank
employees two years ago is a significant piece of evidence in a race
discrimination suit brought by two former Citibank employees against
the company. Citibank believes the case, which is pending in federal
district court in Manhattan, is without merit and has filed a motion
to dismiss it, a company spokesman said.
A related suit, in federal district court in Brooklyn, was dismissed
recently, in part because the judge ruled that a single offensive
e-mail was not enough by itself to create a hostile working
environment. Stephen T. Mitchell, a lawyer for the former employees,
said he plans an appeal. In the Edward Jones incident, an employee at the company's St. Louis
offices complained several weeks ago about receiving an
"inappropriate" e-mail, said Mary Beth Heying, a company spokeswoman.
She refused to describe the content of the message in any detail, but
said the company took action "to make sure each of us is comfortable
in our place of work."
An article in The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, citing an employee, said
that a company memorandum sent out in response to the incident
mentioned e-mail containing pornography or off-color jokes.
After receiving the complaint, the company began investigating the
matter, and "discovered quite a few associates were involved," Heying
said. She said the misconduct included not just e-mail abuse, but
inappropriate use of the Internet. Punishment was meted out based on
the seriousness of the offense. Those who were not fired received
warning letters, she said.
Heying said the company allows for some personal use of the e-mail
system. For example, she said, an employee could use it to contact a
child at college.
But before they are given Internet access, Edward Jones employees are
required to sign a document that delineates appropriate and
inappropriate uses of the company network. "It is a very clear policy
on what is acceptable, what is not acceptable and what the
ramifications will be," Heying said.9/27/00 You'll find help with your Web Detective assignment here under Interface Design. Look for content about Web site navigation. CNNfn - Internet boosts fears of reference-checking - April 01, 1999
Internet boosts fears of reference-checking April 01, 1999: 11:08 a.m. ET USA TODAY (NB) -- By Stephanie Armour, USA TODAY. A growing number of job
seekers who want to find out what their former employers are saying about
them are using the Internet to find the services that make the calls.
Some call the trend a job hunter's best defense against negative
references. But critics say it only entraps former employers and fuels
lawsuits.
Another concern is that the accessibility of these services will have a
chilling effect on what companies say about former employees.
How the process works: Job seekers provide a list of former employers who
should be called. For fees ranging from $60 to $100, the services ask
questions about the applicant and provide a written report.
Some of the services use court reporters, maintain a database of
employment lawyers or send information kits outlining legal options to job
seekers as preparation for potential lawsuits if references are negative.
"Some poor applicants are like the walking dead," says Guy Fowler at
Documented Reference Check (DRC), a service that reports doing thousands
of checks each month. "They can't get hired, and they don't know why."
To avoid accusations of snaring unsuspecting companies, the services don't
pose as a potential employer. Instead, they may say they've been hired to
do a background check for the purpose of employment.
"We stay totally above board," says Pam Myers, president of HRI, which
does several hundred such reference checks a month.
But that doesn't mean the services don't camouflage themselves. To keep
former employers from catching on, DRC uses subsidiaries that close shop
every 90 days and reopen with new names, letterheads and phone numbers.
Allison & Taylor, which did more than 4,000 checks for clients in January,
uses two phone systems to foil caller-identification systems.
"It's amazing what people will say," says Terra Dourlain .
Some of the services have quietly existed for years, but their debut on
the Internet has brought a flurry of business.
The trend has some lawyers urging employers to only give out bare-bones
references.
Others say the services are a valuable courtroom tool.
Kurt Entsminger, a Sterling, Va., lawyer, used DRC reports to help land a
million-dollar verdict. "It was a very important piece of evidence to show
blackballing was going on."
Reported By USA TODAY, http://www.usatoday.com .
10:02 CST
(19990401/WIRES ONLINE, PC, BUSINESS, LEGAL/) home | digitaljam | contents | search | stock quotes | help
Copyright © 1999 CNN America, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CNNfn - Net job-seeking gets more traditional - January 20, 1999
Net job-seeking gets more traditional January 20, 1999: 4:56 p.m. ET USA TODAY (NB) -- By Stephanie Armour, USA TODAY. Job hunting on the
Internet isn't just for the technology savvy anymore.
Clergy members, college deans and others in more traditional fields are
jumping online to find work, a shift that is fast shaking up the job
search.
"It's changing the business," says Jeffrey Taylor, CEO of Monster.com, an
online career network. "Before, there was no way to mass market yourself." A ranking of jobs sought via the Internet found only three of the top 10
searches in the third quarter were specifically related to technical
fields, according to CareerMosaic, an online employment site. Common
keywords included management, nursing and finance.
"When we tell people that 'manager' is the No. 1 search, they're amazed,"
says Bernard Hodes , president and CEO of CareerMosaic's parent company.
Now low-tech employees are becoming more comfortable with computers and
willing to job hop in a tight labor market. The surge is coming as the
number of employers with online job postings explodes. Levi Strauss, Nike
and Salomon Smith Barney are among many who are using their Web sites as a
recruiting tool.
Despite the online trend, Dan Blohowiak, author of Your People are Your
Product, warns that companies that abandon traditional methods altogether
risk losing out on good hires. But few are backing away. A survey of
employers by the American Management Association found 70% were using the
Internet in some way in their job recruitment, up from about 50% a year
ago. Signs of the shift abound. Two Internet job-posting companies, The
Monster Board and hotjobsndash.com, will be first-time advertisers on the
Super Bowl telecast. "I've got a foot in the door," says Denise Myler, 41,
of Idaho Falls, Idaho, who is job hunting online for a home-based,
data-entry job. "I'm getting a lot more exposure that way."
Even those who aren't actively looking are casting a net to see who might
bite.
"It puts my talents out there, and then I can just sort of screen calls,"
says Michael Hilgenberg, 43, a sales vice president in Thousand Oaks,
Calif. "It seems a lot more efficient." But it may be difficult to update
online rsums.
And if a cloaking service isn't used, posting rsums online can be risky.
"People have literally been let go once a rsum is found online," says Tom
Flood, marketing director for JobOptions, an online job service.
Reported by USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com
10:23 CST
(19990114/Copyright 1998/WIRES ONLINE, BUSINESS/) home | digitaljam | contents | search | stock quotes | help
Copyright © 1999 CNN America, Inc.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Students Search Web for First Real-World Jobs
April 29, 1999 Students Search Web for First Real-World Jobs
By LISA GUERNSEY
It was 3 o'clock on a Wednesday morning, and Carla Arellano was sitting
in front of her computer in her off-campus apartment, trying to keep
her eyes open. In just a few hours, her résumé was due at Georgetown
University's career center. Scott Robinson for The New York Times At that late hour, her main concern was making sure that her résumé
had the right keywords. "I was trying to put certain words at the
beginning of a sentence, so that a computer might catch it more
easily," Ms. Arellano said, recalling that sleepless night. "
'Analytical' -- that was one of my words. And 'qualitative skills.'
And 'consulting.' "
Ms. Arellano, a senior at Georgetown, was having her first encounter
with a high-tech job search. She was building an electronic résumé
that could easily be found once planted into a prospective employer's
computerized database. She was also scouring the Internet for Web
sites with résumé-writing advice and bookmarking job boards. But she
wasn't finding the experience to be everything she expected.
"Everyone said that the Internet would help," she said, "but it was
not as easy as everyone said it would be."
Before the Internet, job searches were done in person. College career
offices were nerve centers on campus, as places where students would
leaf through binders full of career information and sign up for
interviews with employers who came to campus. Job fairs required
attendance. The firm handshake and clear gaze were the order of the
day.
Now most students visit career centers online first. They post résumés
and search for job information on the Internet.
They may close the deal in person, but they often start in front of
the computer.
“On Monster.com, I would get four to five E-mail messages a day,
but they were geared to people with a lot of programming
experience.”
Tony Oliver, Georgetown University
New York University, for example, has developed an in-house system
called Careernet that gives students online access to job postings
aimed at N.Y.U. students. Georgetown has developed a Web-based
scheduling system, through which students find out if they have been
selected for interviews with employers coming to campus and then sign
up for time slots. Columbia University uses a similar system that
requires students to send their résumés to the career center
electronically.
Most students in the job market are intimately familiar with their
campus's career center Web site, even if they have never visited the
office in person.
Kristi Syrdahl, an N.Y.U. junior, said she had had more luck with her
university's Careernet than with nationwide job boards. She spent her
winter break using her home computer to search for a summer job or
internship. She found not one but two. She also found her current
part-time job through the Careernet.
But many students feel the same ambivalence about electronic job
hunting that Ms. Arellano did.
They love the Internet's speed and its breadth of information. Some
students said they checked online job postings whenever they found
themselves near a computer. But many of the same students are not
hopeful about finding a job online. And they are wary about technology
-- instead of humans -- making decisions about which jobs they might
be qualified for. Carol T. Powers for The New York Times This should be a good year to experiment with ways to find jobs, since
there seem to be quite a few jobs out there. Employers who
participated in a survey last fall by the National Association of
Colleges and Employers forecasted a 10 percent increase in the number
of openings this year. While the job market is not as flush as it was
for 1998 graduates -- who benefited from the best year this decade for
job seekers -- it is still quite strong, said Camille Luckenbaugh, the
association's employment information manager.
As might be expected, jobs in information technology are some of the
easiest to find, and as with many other high-tech positions, most of
them are posted online. Some companies have devoted sections of their
Web sites to recruitment, announcing job openings and requesting
résumés. National online job boards like Monster.com and Careerpath
list thousands of openings every day -- many of which are in
telecommunications, software and technical consulting industries. Job
seekers can simply skim the job postings, or they may post digital
versions of their résumés and fill out online forms that are compiled
in databases viewed by employers.
Jobs for college grads without computer-science backgrounds, however,
are harder to find using online job boards.
Monster.com has a "campus zone" and Career Mosaic has a "college
connection" section. Both offer advice, but most of their listings are
not aimed at people fresh out of college.
CONSUMER INFORMATION
Career counselors for college students offer this advice:
List your computer skills on your résumé, even if you are not
looking for a high-tech job.
Don't include your Internet home page address on your résumé
unless you have groomed the site for a business audience.
Include your e-mail address, and check for messages often.
Don't expect companies to open your e-mail attachments. Always
send another copy of your résumé and cover letter as a text
message in a fax or via postal mail.
Before going to an interview, visit the employer's Web site.
Know what's on it.
For the most part, getting your foot in the door still entails
getting your foot in the door. Try to line up in-person
interviews when you can.
The best place to start an online job search is the Web page of
your college career center. These sites may also help:
THE NON-PROFIT CAREER CENTER:
www.idealist.org/career.html
THE ENTRY LEVEL JOB SEEKER ASSISTANT:
members.aol.com/dylander/jobhome.html
CAREER MOSAIC'S COLLEGE CONNECTION:
www.careermosaic.com/cm/cc/cc1.html
MONSTER.COM'S MONSTER CAMPUS:
campus.monster.com
WETFEET.COM:
www.wetfeet.com
"Online searching wasn't very helpful," said Tony Oliver, a English
major at Georgetown who was looking for a consulting job. "On
Monster.com, I would get four to five e-mail messages a day, but they
were geared to people with a lot of programming experience."
Patricia Esianor, a graduate student in public administration at New
York University, said she had "been searching basically everything"
but had not had much success online either. She posted her résumé on
the Job Direct Web site.
"So far the feedback I've received has been for things I don't want to
do, in places I don't want to go," she said. She wondered if a real
human being was even reading her résumé.
"It seems as if a computer is reading it," she said. "It's too
impersonal."
Despite such setbacks, most students still seem to visit online job
boards when starting their search. They are also putting a lot of
energy into creating the perfect electronic résumé, sometimes called a
"scannable" résumé, one without any special formatting or graphics
that might trip up an optical scanner.
These days, most electronic résumés never even make it into print.
They are simply sent via e-mail or pasted into online forms. College
career centers devote entire workshops to electronic résumés, teaching
students how to send them as e-mail attachments or create text-only
versions without tabs or line breaks that get garbled in transmission. A few companies simply print out these résumés once they have arrived
electronically. But some large corporations like Hewlett-Packard and
Kaiser-Permanente feed them into résumé management databases. Many of
the databases organize the résumés by matching words in them with a
list of keywords that the companies are looking for. Seeding a résumé
with the right keywords can become a full-time obsession for some
college seniors -- particularly those business or computer science
majors who hope to work for large companies.
George Tarnopolsky, a business management and marketing major at
Cornell University, said he had even seen students add a section
called "keywords" at the bottom of their résumés, right under
"experience" and "education." Once the section is added, Tarnopolsky
said, the number of times employers look at your résumé increases from
"something like three times a week to five times a day." (People using
Monster.com, for example, can check how many employers have looked at
their résumés.)
Liberal arts students do not usually spend as much time focusing on
keywords because their target employers are less likely to have large,
automated résumé-management systems. And in general, these students
may find the Web less useful. Many liberal arts students search for
jobs in the nonprofit arena or at government agencies -- positions
that are often the hardest to find. Those employers do not often rely
as heavily on national online job boards, like Careerpath. Also,
nonprofit employers rarely have the resources to visit campuses for
interviews.
Instead, such employers are starting to send job listings to college
career centers, for posting on their online job boards. Or they send
information about the positions to an online service called Jobtrak.
Jobtrak maintains a database of job openings for use by college career
centers only. Employers send their job postings to Jobtrak and
designate the colleges they would like to target. They pay $18 per
listing per college, or less if they are posting to more than one.
More than 800 campuses use the service.
“Everyone said that the Internet would help, but it was not as
easy as everyone said it would be.”
Carla Arellano, Georgetown University
To give employers yet another way to narrow their recruiting, the Ivy
League schools, along with Stanford University and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, served as hosts of an "Ivy+ Virtual Career
Fair" two weeks ago. The one-week "fair" took place on the Web. Only
students from the 10 elite colleges could enter. Once they logged in,
they were required to add their résumés to an electronic book, which
was open to employers. Students could browse job openings and ask
employers questions via e-mail or online bulletin boards.
The Center for Arts and Culture, in Washington, was one of the 150
participating employers. Malissa R. Bennett, programs and operations
manager for the center, said that the fair was the center's first
chance to actively recruit students online. She added that she was
impressed with what she saw.
Still, she was not ready to go completely digital. When it came to
accepting résumés, "I specifically asked for a paper submission," Ms.
Bennett said. "Some applicants, those who seemed more serious about
the job, took the time to send in a complete paper application with
cover letter, résumé and writing sample."
An awareness of that perception hounds today's college grads.
"e-mailing my résumé didn't get the same results as going to the
career center and meeting companies," said Ms. Arellano, the
Georgetown senior. "It seemed that e-mail wasn't taken as seriously by
employers."
Ms. Arellano did get a job she wanted, as an information-technology
analyst for Chase Manhattan Bank. But she landed it by meeting her
employers face-to-face at an old-fashioned campus interview, with a
paper résumé in hand.
She had mixed feelings looking back at those frenzied weeks she spent
online.
Although she was able to do more research on the Web than would have
been possible otherwise, she didn't like the impersonal nature of
applying for jobs over a computer.
But she couldn't be happier about one use of the technology: When
Chase decided to let her know that she would soon get a formal job
offer, the bank sent her a quick note via e-mail.
The dangers of posting your resume online - Jul. 29, 1999
NEW YORK (CNNfn) - If you think posting your resume online is the
next great way to land better employment, you're probably not alone. A growing number of job-seekers are flocking to the Web in the
hopes of avoiding the mass mailing of cover letters and those
networking phone calls to their cousin's best friend's brother in
the hopes of securing an interview.
But if you think you can post your resume, kick back and watch
the offers flood in, you may have another thing coming.
"Some people have better luck than others," said Pam Dixon,
author of "Job Searching Online for Dummies." "It all depends on
what kind of field you're in and where you are on the job
continuum."
More importantly, by posting your resume online, you may be
opening yourself up to current employer ire and identity fraud.
Job seekers flock online There is little question that the proliferation of
resume-posting services on the Internet has dramatically simplified
the job-hunting process.
Whereas prospective job-seekers once had to hunt down willing
employers through classified ads and repeated phone calls and
companies had to pay big bucks for recruiters to find sought-after
candidates, prospective employees and employers can now skip the
middleman altogether by logging onto the Net.
The Web also has increasingly put the ball in the job-seeker's
court.
"In the old days, networking was about who you knew. In the
Internet arena, it's about who knows you," said Peter Weddle, author
of "Internet Resumes: Take the Net to Your Next Job." But the success of online resume-posting can be difficult to
gauge, since Internet job sites are generally responsible only for
bringing applicants and employers together and rarely are
responsible for sealing the deal. However, most of the larger
job-search sites report an increase in both the number of resumes
posted and employers using their database service. Monster Board
alone, one of the most popular job-seeking Web sites, hosts more
than 1.6 million resumes with thousands of new resumes being posted
every month.
The popularity of online resume banks among employers has been
prompted in part by the tight labor market, which has forced
companies to get creative when looking for new blood.
Increased access to the "passive" job seeker also has bolstered
resume-posting sites. Passive job seekers, in growing demand as the
labor market becomes more and more competitive, are those that are
generally satisfied with their current employment situation but
might be open to new opportunities under the right circumstances.
Landing an interview Recent college graduates and employees who have been in the
work force two or three years, especially in the fields of high-tech
and finance, have the best luck landing a job through a resume bank,
as do high-level executives, according to Dixon.
"When recruiters go online, they are just assuming a lot of
resumes are going to be in the early career stage," Dixon said. And
good executives are just eternally in demand.
But mid-career workers can have a difficult time finding a job
by posting their resumes on the Internet. That's because mid-career
job seekers tend to be more choosy than younger workers regarding
location, salary and benefits, making finding the right job online
more difficult for them, says Dixon.
Privacy concerns Because posting a resume online is so easy, it may be tempting
to just throw up your resume on as many sites as possible to bolster
your chances of landing a job.
But that strategy could blow up in your face.
"There is no privacy on the Internet and job seekers need to be
really careful about where they put their resumes," Weddle said.
"It's almost guaranteed that your resume will end up in places that
you had no idea even existed." Resumes get duplicated throughout the Web because Internet
companies hoping to build up their own resume banks use software
programs, known as "spiders," to pluck resumes from competitors'
sites. By bolstering their databases, these companies hope to draw
big advertisers to their own job sites.
Another problem with online resumes is "salvaging." Companies
wanting to find out which of their high-level staff members are
seeking new opportunities sometimes hire human resource specialists
known as "salvagers," who scour job sites for current employee's
resumes, often simply by searching for the company's name.
However, these cloak-and-dagger tactics are largely limited to
high-level employees with access to sensitive company information or
intellectual property.
"This is a real problem only if you are working in a high-tech
field or biotech or anywhere where there is highly-competitive
software development or research and analysis going on," Dixon said. While many prospective job-seekers may be most worried about
their current employer spotting their resume online, identity theft
or stalking should probably be at least as big a concern. Resumes
often contain sensitive personal information, such as addresses and
telephone numbers, that can be used fraudulently to set up bank
accounts and credit cards in your name.
"There are a lot of creeps on the Internet," Weddle said.
"There's just a certain amount of risk."
Personal data is also sometimes used to put people on direct
mail lists or marketing lists.
Job sites respond The growing concern among consumers regarding privacy on the
Internet has sparked new protective measures on many job Web sites
Monster.com, for instance, allows users to choose between
"live" or "archived" resumes. A live resume can be accessed by any
of the site's paid subscribers. An archived resume, on the other
hand, is kept on file until job-seekers find an ad they want to
respond to and send companies their resume through Monster.com.
Another strategy, adopted by CareerPath, allows users to submit
confidential resumes, which leave out the name and contact
information of the job-seeker. Companies interested in hiring these
applicants can send them e-mail through an anonymous address hosted
by CareerPath.
Eliminating contact information or even the name of former
employers, as some resume banks permit, can be problematic, however.
For one, a "salvager" will easily be able to recognize an employee's
resume by a few characteristics, such as the company name or even
division and job title, even if the person's identity is missing.
Leaving out information may also limit your job search.
"If you eliminate too much information on the resume document,
it becomes less valuable," said Bruce Skillings, president of
CareerMosaic, which takes a more laissez-faire approach to its
resume bank and currently does not offer any additional privacy
protection. The company does plan to introduce some new privacy
features early next year.
"We don't want to give people a false sense of security.
There's no way of knowing that a recruiter (subscribing to the
database) is not working as a third party for a company that you
don't want to see your resume," Skillings said, claiming it's simply
impossible for employment sites to screen all their database
subscribers.
Another industry insider says it's just a matter of time before
the fears regarding employers finding out you are seeking new
opportunities dissipates altogether.
"Eventually, everyone is going to have their resume on the Web
and there will be less and less sensitivity to this issue," said
Craig Besant, vice president of marketing for Monster.com. "Just
because you have your resume up there doesn't mean you're unhappy."
Guarding your privacy If you are planning to take your resume online, there are
precautions you can take.
For one, don't post your resume just anywhere. Choose a site
that has an effective firewall, a security system that keeps
outsiders, including "spiders," away from a Web site's internal
network. You can tell an Internet site is protected by a firewall if
it requests a password for access to its resume bank.
Exclude personal information, such as addresses and phone
numbers, from your online resume and consider using a third party
e-mail address, sponsored by Yahoo! or Hotmail, to make it more
difficult for con artists and current employers to identify you.
Consider using an online job agent instead of a resume-posting
service, especially if there is a legitimate concern your employer
could find out. Job agents, offered by many of the same sites that
offer resume-posting, e-mail users when they have targeted positions
job-seekers may be interested in based on a profile they have filled
out.
Finally, although many companies purge resumes from their
databases every 4 to 12 months, it may be a good idea to date your
resume. That way if an old resume comes back to haunt you, you can
point out to your employer that it is left over from a previous job
search.
Bear in mind that privacy may be less of an issue for you than
for others. If you are straight out of college for instance or
unemployed, there will be no major reprisals if someone runs across
your resume online. If you are a high-level tech worker with access
to sensitive information, however, the consequences may be more dire
and you should probably avoid online resumes altogether. Head to
your nearest recruiter instead.
Ultimately, job seekers will have to decide for themselves
whether the risks of putting their resume online are worth the
benefits.
"It comes down to personal choice," CareerMosiac's Skillings
said. "You have to police yourself in this world… you have to decide
whether you want to expose yourself or not." stories
Web provides job listings for all careers - June 10, 1998
Web provides job listings for all careers - June 10, 1998
Get wired, get hired Truckers, ministers and midwives can all look for work using the Web June 10, 1998: 2:41 p.m. ET Job poaching grows popular - Sept. 19, 1997 Wanted: high-tech execs - Sept. 18, 1997
Monster Board
CareerPath.com
The Dixon Report More related sites... NEW YORK (CNNfn) - If you're looking for a job using
the information superhighway, be prepared to yield to some 18-wheelers
who've been cruising the Web the same reason.
In the past, the career opportunities to be found on the Internet have
been almost exclusively geared toward sysops and other computer-minded
employment seekers.
However, as more and more people take to the World Wide Web, job listings
have responded to the varied market, offering everybody from ministers to
midwives a chance to find their dream jobs.
It's not just white collar positions. TruckNet, for example, looks to
hook up companies that need their products shipped with people who have
the big rigs to take those shipments across the country.
The trucking industry has been faced with too few drivers for too many
shipments for years and TruckNet president Craig Zweiner explained that,
despite trucker stereotypes, the Web was the best place to find these
folks.
"We are finding out that the veteran drivers are logging onto the
Internet," said Zweiner. "They may be looking for a change and with
TruckNet they can fill out one application and send it to many companies."
Zweiner said truckers' interest in the Internet is unsurprising since
many are away from their families for long periods of time and e-mail is
gradually replacing phone calls as the preferred mode of keeping in touch.
The blue-collar job listings aren't limited to just truck drivers.
HVACjob lets people who fix heating, ventilating, air conditioning and
refrigeration equipment find the best positions available. Manufacturing
Marketplace allows you to look for a wider variety of
manufacturing-related positions.
If your job search is looking to take you to a higher plane, consider
MinistryLink. Sponsored by Saint John's School of Theology & Seminary in
Collegeville, Minn., MinistryLink seeks to pair up those people interested
in a religious career with appropriate openings all over the world.
"It was a matter where we saw a need and asked how we could help connect
those who are looking with openings," said Linda Schreiber, coordinator of
the Web site which was established in 1994.
While St. John's is a Catholic school, the site advertises positions from
various faiths. Most postings, though, are Catholic.
Many of the job openings are in the Midwest but MinistryLink could set
you up with a position in more remote climes. For example, an Alaskan
Diocese is looking for a campus minister to "carry out adult religious
education in Eskimo bush villages."
Perhaps no non-computer industry has embraced Web-based job listings more
than health care.
A widely expanding array of job opportunities has led the industry to
seek out applicants in every corner and the Web provides a way to find
those qualified for health care work. Among the top health care job
posting sites are Allied Health Opportunities, Health Care Recruitment
Online and Medsearch.
Some health care sites have gotten even more specific, however. The
American College of Nurse-Midwives are looking for a few good people to
care for women during labor and birth.
The time is now It would be a mistake to think if your career doesn't involve computer
code or HTML you don't need to be ready for how the Internet is changing
job searches, said Pam Dixon.
Dixon, the author of "Job Searching Online for Dummies" said Web-based
employment ads aren't just for techies anymore. "If you want to look for a
job, you'd best be online."
"If you want to look for a job, you'd best be online."
Pam Dixon
Author, "Job Searching Online for Dummies"
She sees a trend toward more specific, niche type of job posting sites and
away from increasingly huge warehouses of searchable job listings such as
Monster Board.
Your first step if you are in a non-tech career, she said, should still
start with these larger forums, however. These sites provide you with a
sense of the lingo and requirements of the types of jobs you are looking
for.
Next, you should put together an electronic resume, something you can
e-mail to prospective employers or post on the more specific job sites.
Many of the job posting sites have do-it-yourself resume forms available
for you to use but you'll want to make your own electronic version.
In addition to a regular paper resume, you'll want both a scannable and a
plain-text version.
A scannable resume is scanned into the firm's computer as an image.
Companies often use software to sift through these scannable resumes,
separating those which contain keywords appropriate to the jobs.
This is where your previous knowledge of buzzwords from larger job sites
becomes important. Put in as many as you can while still maintaining a
readable, cohesive resume.
A plain-text resume can be e-mailed and does not contain any kind of
formatting. This is important because this type of resume allows the
recipient to read it regardless of her type of computer.
Now you're all set for your Web job hunt. However, you don't have to limit
yourself exclusively to employment within your current career.
If double-backflips and flaming hoops are for you, you may want to run off
and join the circus. Cirque du Soleil to be exact. Cirque du Soleil is
currently looking for performers with talents in acrobatics, circus arts,
singing, dancing, music and theater.
-- by staff writer Randall J. Schultz
|